Kamis, September 29, 2011
IFLA AWARDS-1st Place: Layers of Time

Title : Layers of Time
Award : IFLA Group Han Prize for Student Landscape Architecture
Authors : Vasiliki Nikoloutsou, Isavella - Ines Oikonomopoulou- Paraskeyopoulou
University : National Technical University of Athens
Department : School of Architecture
Country : Greece

This project deals with Kotichi Lagoon, an aquatic biosystem of international significance and the most important ecosystem of Peloponnese in Greece. The transition of the lagoon from gradual natural evolution, but mostly from unsustainable exploitation, as well as insufficient management, have irreversibly degraded the landscape. This proposal considers the borders through a new definition of time, and considers protection of the fauna and flora of the area, together with human movement, circulation, education and framed views.

The jury commended the clear and strong narrative, and the contemporary approach of dealing with the landscape as well as cultural issues. This is a very convincing project that pushes the boundaries between many disciplines and is not afraid to touch on the ephemeral and intangible concept of time. It is subtle, and could be realized with minimal intervention. The presentation is graphically very strong and poetic.


Courtessy by: http://www.hsr.ch/IFLA.7109.0.html )

Explanatory text
Layers of time

Landscape includes the notion of everchanging time and matter. It is a form in constant flow.Nature's dynamics are in need of space to work and to complete its cycling way.Urban growth,cities and villages,extension,cultivations,human activity.
The uncultivated regions are in a state of extinction.The intensive land cultivation, through agricultural organization, is the spatial translation of the human intervention on the landscape. This way, the private interest comes in conflict with the nature's need for protection and the people's desire to approach and feel the natural landscape.


Kotichi. A small brackish lagoon separated from the sea by dunes and surrounded by patches of saltmarsh and agricultural land. The transition of the lagoon from the gradual natural evolution but mostly from the unsustainable exploitation,in addition to the insufficient management, have irreversibly degraded the landscape.
agriculturalintensification,decreasing of the lagoon's area,reduces of the lagoon’s depth,deformation of the water's ingredients,disturbance,bird species in extinction,endangered flora.

Space &Time. Our proposal is a different approach of time.The borders are seen as a new definition of time, which filters the threats of the ecotope and degrades the human experience. Time-oriented.

The site. the unifed ecosystem of Strofylia – Kotichi,is an aquatic biosystem of international significance and the most important ecosystem of Peloponnese. It's total area is about 35,000 ha and is constantly under pressure from the surrounding human activity. It’s being divided.
Kotichi. The most southern part of the ecosystem.The lagoon is surrounded by a flat area of towns and villages.The national highway and the railway,are located only 5 km away from the lagoon limits, and they are characteristics of the rough human intervention on the natural landscape.

Biodiversity.Circle of time.The area is equivalent to the nest.The proposal works primarily as a protective shield to the fauna and flora of the area,bringing back the cycling time. The nest's weaving works conceptionally and organizes the various relations between the living organisms that live in the area.The different layers are traced:the flying of the birds,the movement of the water and the fish,the matter flow.

Swing.Dotted line. Wander, signage of the points of stopping.The value of the moment.Water, land,water. Between sea and lagoon.The key to design is the short sections and their manipulation.Vewpoints.Highlights of the natural landscape,framing views.Seeing the view.

Fixation.Continuous line. Limited tour.A first reading of the area, quick tour.Line above water. Visual contact with the lagoon.Cultural , environmental education.Opening to the space.

Flow. waterline.Slow motion. Return to the beginning point, being guided by the water flow. Reaching the border through the water, with small boats.

(source: http://www.hsr.ch/IFLA.7109.0.html )


Read more!
 
posted by JOHN F.PAPILAYA at 21.34 | Permalink | 1 comments
IFLA AWARDS-2nd Place: Vibrant Land

VIBRANT LAND

Title :Vibrant Land - shifting (urban) boundaries in Coastal North Carolina
Award : IFLA Zvi Miller Prize
Authors : Jorrit Noordhuizen, Inge Kersten
University : Wageningen University
Department : Chairgroup Landscape Architecture
Country : the Netherlands

This project deals with the dynamic landscape of the barrier island coast of North Carolina. The urban area at the shoreline clashes with the natural flows of the landscape, resulting in a landscape of loss and destruction, so that natural boundary areas between urban and rural have almost completely disappeared. The project shows that in order to transform this landscape into a sustainable and attractive environment, it is necessary to enable natural and human flows to interact. The dune landscape is rebuilt, and a new public space typology is introduced that engages natural and human flows, utilizing most notably a simple designed wooden structure that has great versatility of use.

This project succeeds in proposing landscape to live in, rather than landscape to simply be consumed. It emphasises the process of remaking a more sustainable landscape for living, and a more attractive landscape for experiencing, notably considering this throughout the seasons. The use of the wooden structural element is variously concealed and revealed, resulting in subtle and variable landforms. The project includes the interesting notion of using sand, an element that is constantly shifting, but that is anchored around one element. Playful and functional at the same time. Graphics were very convincing and clear.


(Courtesy by: http://www.hsr.ch/IFLA.7109.0.html )

Explanatory text
VIBRANT LAND – shifting (urban) boundaries in Coastal North Carolina


One of the most dynamic coastal landscapes in the World is the barrier island coast of North Carolina (the Outerbanks). Its shape and location change on a daily base, orchestrated by the dynamics of the sea (natural flows). The attractiveness of the coastal landscape seems to be an important pull-factor for seasonal occupation, urban settlement and expansion (human flows). However, the space consuming urban fabric (example area; Hayman Boulevard, Kitty Hawk, NC) clashes with the natural flows of the landscape, resulting in a landscape of loss and destruction. Natural boundary areas between urban and rural almost completely disappeared.


Man clearly has lost connection with the dynamics of nature. We show that in order to transform this landscape into a sustainable and attractive environment, it is necessary to enable natural and human flows to interact. The urban fabric turned out to be a symbol of standardized and uniform values with little spatial variation. In order to be able to propose and implement a process of transformation, it is important to enable people to relate to the measures that are proposed.

A start for transformation lies within the ‘voids’ in the landscape that can gradually absorb the natural flows. The ‘early wins’ lie in rebuilding the (dune) landscape by reactivating these voids, providing chances for new atmospheres and shelters for man and nature. Key in this transformation process is a new public space typology that engages natural and human flows.

A structure that is a fundamental element for rebuilding the dune morphology (natural flows, winter), that enables people to add their own program to it (temporal use, summer) and allows people to respond actively to the uncertainties of natural flows. The structure is build up from several simple wooden segments and can change its shape according to functional needs. Through its accessible scale and high performance effect this structure engages natural and human flows in a changing landscape.

(source: http://www.hsr.ch/IFLA.7109.0.html )






Read more!
 
posted by JOHN F.PAPILAYA at 21.31 | Permalink | 0 comments
IFLA AWARDS-3rd Place: Vertical Densities

Vertical Densities

Title : “Vertical Densities: productive landscapes at the urban edge”
Award : Merit Award
Authors : E. Scott Mitchell, Amy Whitesides, Chen Chen
University : Harvard Graduate School of Design
Department : Landscape Architecture
Country : United States

Group Members:The South Weymouth Naval Air Station (SOWEY) is a 750 hectare ex-military base located at the convergence of 3 suburban towns. In reaction to proposed plans for SOWEY that do not adequately address the region ʼs economic, land use and environmental issues, this project considers the site as a public regional resource and a potential prototype for urban development. It protects and replenishes freshwater resources, provides flood control services, conserves habitat for endangered species, and serves as a testing ground for emergent high altitude wind generation technologies that could serve as an economic resource for the region.

The jury found this to be a powerful and artistic submission that considers energy and the investigation of alternatives for an inevitable future without many of the conventional energy sources. The project proposes a multi-layered landscape that most notably explores the airspace through innovative considerations of various uses. The sky is the limit with this project! Graphically the project is superior with some visionary decisions about how to communicate the ideas which resulted in a highly integrated presentation.


(Courtesy By http://www.hsr.ch/IFLA.7109.0.html )

Explanatory text
VERTICAL DENSITIES PRODUCTIVE LANDSCAPES AT URBAN EDGE


The South Weymouth Naval Air Station (SOWEY) is a 750 hectare ex-military base located at the convergence of 3 suburban towns. Highly contested plans for its redevelopment currently include a movie studio complex, retail shops and a planned community. The proposed plans for SOWEY do not address the region’s declining economic conditions, the existing excess of residential land, the lack of public open space or the current water shortages and the pressure the development would place on these resources. Current proposals view the site as an economic resource for a few businesses. Larger issues of wildlife conservation, public health and safety and environmental productivity are ignored.

In contrast, our proposal considers the site a regional resource and a potential prototype for urban development that places a premium on the environmental and public health services of open land overlooked by typical urban expansions such as those proposed. We envision SOWEY as a public space that protects and replenishes freshwater resources, provides important flood control services, conserves habitat for endangered species, and serves as a testing ground for emergent high altitude wind generation technologies that could serve as an economic resource for the region.

The site’s concentration of high altitude winds makes it a perfect site to test electricity production through emergent flying electric generation (FEG) technologies. Traditional wind turbines are often unwanted due to noise, visual impact and bird kill. The FEGs to be tested on site are free from these common concerns. The small footprint they require allows the ground plane to be freed up to serve as recreation space and critical wetland and grassland habitat. In addition to providing habitat to migrating bird species, the wetlands collect storm water runoff from adjacent towns, direct it away from contaminated areas, and slow the flow of water from the site helping to replenish groundwater resources while limiting common downstream flooding events. The wetlands and grasslands are threaded with pedestrian walkways and service roads connecting the adjacent but disconnected towns to each other and to the commuter rail and highway that line the site’s western border. The result is an innovative treatment of the urban–rural edge that could be implemented at SOWEY or adapted and applied as a regional concept of how this edge space could be a richly layered economically viable resource for people and wildlife.

(source: http://www.hsr.ch/IFLA.7109.0.html )




Read more!
 
posted by JOHN F.PAPILAYA at 21.26 | Permalink | 0 comments
IFLA Student Design Competition 2011
P
rior to the 48th IFLA World Congress, the annual student competition was conducted by the HSR University of Applied Science in Rapperswil. The topic’s guiding principle was "Urban Boundaries", because dealing with land as a resource in a sustainable way is a globally recognized goal.

A record number of entrants submitted their concepts dealing with landscape architectural responses to conflicting values for land, and showing that urban boundaries can be positive transitional elements between the urban landscape and the open landscape. The entrants were undergraduate and master students from all over the world.

A jury under the chair of Prof. Beverly Sandalack appraised and selected the winners by mid April. The competition office led by Prof. Joachim Kleiner and Dipl. Ing. Kerstin Gödecke. Overall 360 design concepts were submitted which was clearly above the expectation of 250 concepts.

The jury was composed of five members:

Andy Cao, Vietnam/USA, Loeb Fellow 2010-11, Harvard University, Graduate School of Design
Maike van Stiphout, the Netherlands, DS Landschapsarchitecten, Amsterdam
Prof. Christoph Jensen, Denmark/Germany, Hochschule Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Fakultat
Landschaftsarchitektur, Freising
Prof. Joachim Kleiner, Switzerland, Hochschule Rapperswil
Prof. Dr. Beverly Sandalack, Canada, Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary,Chair of the Jury

Award Winners IFLA Student Design Competition 2011

1st Place : Layers of Time


Title ; Layers of Time
Award ; IFLA Group Han Prize for Student Landscape Architecture
Authors ; Vasiliki Nikoloutsou, Isavella - Ines Oikonomopoulou-
Paraskeyopoulou

University ; National Technical University of Athens
Department ; School of Architecture
Country ; Greece

2nd Place: Vibrant Land

Title ; Vibrant Land - shifting (urban) boundaries in Coastal North
Carolina

Award ; IFLA Zvi Miller Prize
Authors ; Jorrit Noordhuizen, Inge Kersten
University ; Wageningen University
Department ; Chairgroup Landscape Architecture
Country ; the Netherlands

3rd Place: Vertical Densities


Title ; “Vertical Densities: productive landscapes at the urban edge”
Award ; Merit Award
Authors ; E. Scott Mitchell, Amy Whitesides, Chen Chen
University ; Harvard Graduate School of Design
Department ; Landscape Architecture
Country ; United States

Jury Awards
In addition to the three prizes, the Jury identified seven additional projects for acknowledgement of achievement:



Fishpondscape
Title; Fishpondscape - Urban Transition Zone Landscape Planning and Design in Deep Bay of Hong Kong
Authors; Liu Tong, Yu Cong, Zhang Yang, Zhang Yin, Bi Rutao
University; Beijing Forestry University
Department ; Landscape Architecture
Country; China

Connecting Worlds
Title; Connecting Worlds
Authors; Marius Ege, Christian Zink
University; Universität Stuttgard
Department ; Institute of Urban Planning/Department of International Urbanism, Institute of Landscape Planning and Ecology
Country; Germany

Rooting Rural Communities
Title; Rooting Rural Communities
Authors; Emily Miller, Kelly Bergeron
University; University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Department; School of Architecture and Design
Country; United States

Cell Engineering
Title; Cell Engineering - the Rescue of Moribund Urban Boundary
Authors; Yue Xu, Jinmu Li, Yezhou Fan, Ke Liu, Tingting Li
University; Suzhou University of Science and Technology
Department ; Landscape Architecture, Urban Planning, Architecture, Interior Design
Country; China

[E]merging Landscapes
Title; [E]merging Landscapes: a comment on urban boundaries
Authors; June Paaskesen, Rikke Welan
University; Copenhagen University
Department ; Landscape Architecture
Country; Denmark

Growing Boundary
Title; Growing Boundary: sustainable recovery of the mangrove at Pearl River Delta
Authors; Chen Yan, Ran Wu, Min Xue, Yang Li, Chengjiang Hu
University ; Beijing Forestry University
Department ; Landscape Architecture
Country; China

Border on the "implantable landscape"
Title; Border on the "implantable landscape": pondering on the transformation of a flying dust arena
Authors; Xin Man, Jing Li, Minyu Zhang, Jinqing, Hua Zhao
University; Beijing Forestry University
Department ; Landscape Architecture
Country; China

STATISTICS - SUBMISSIONS BY COUNTRY

Slovakia 9 - England 6 - Germany 9 - Scotland 2 - Netherlands 8 - Ireland 1 - Denmark 6
Switzerland 5 - United States 28 - Lithuania 4 - Canada 5 - Poland 4 - Argentina 2
Italy 3 - Chile 1 - Russia 3 - Brazil 1 - Iceland 3 - Turkey 3 - China 203 -Austria 2
Taiwan 14 - Belgium 1 - Australia 7 - Spain 2 - Malaysia 5- France 1 - India 4
Croatia 1 - Korea 3 - Hungary 1 - Japan 2 - Romania 1 - Greece 1 Iran 7 - Sweden 1 - Israel 1
Saudi Arabia 1

Total submissions: 361 from 38 countries,
Total ineligible:82


NOTES
The jury makes the following general comments:

- there were a large number of ineligible entries (82) due to multiple reasons - either incomplete or missing declaration form, submissions in a format other than what was specified (e.g. portrait
rather than landscape), excessive text in the description far exceeding the specified character
count, or lacking in endorsement by the dean/head of school. In order for students to avoid this
occurring, it is essential to carefully read the brief (it contains all of the necessary details), and to
ask questions if the instructions are not clear.

- the jury was happy to see that there were so many exciting submissions that push the boundaries of conventional materials and topics - e.g. sand, space, time.

- however, the jury was surprised that there were not enough high quality projects that addressed
the very important issue of urban/rural interface. The jury believes that this is a critical issue that
the profession, and schools, must address. As well, the agricultural edges did not seem to be
dealt with in an effective way, although this is another important topic.

- the jury appreciated the projects that discussed about cultural history, and especially the analysis, however convincing responses to these issues are still not being proposed.

- the jury noted that many of the projects arose from some interesting issues, and in some cases
from some beautiful and complex human and cultural stories, even if the resolution was not always successful.

- many of the projects exhibited a mature way of working with ecological problems, and tackled thesolutions in a technically competent way, however in many cases the design aspect of the project was not nearly as developed or successful. Students (and schools) are urged to consider both analysis and design.

- the high number of submissions is a very positive indication of a strong interest in the IFLA
competition, and it was noted that there were entries from many countries, including places that
have not previously been represented in the competition. The jury strongly encourages the
schools and students to consider entering the competition, as this is excellent experience, as well
as an interesting barometer regarding the state of the programs.

- consideration of an additional duty for jury members while they are present at the host country, for example lecture, panel, symposium or studio review, could make good use of these guests and enrich the school and/or professional enrichment programs.
(source: http://www.hsr.ch/IFLA.7109.0.html )


Read more!
 
posted by JOHN F.PAPILAYA at 21.23 | Permalink | 0 comments
pedoman kompetensi dunia


Landscape architect competency profile

The IFLA has produced the following competency profiles and states that landscape architecture is an interdisciplinary field that comprises several major components: humanities, social and natural sciences, technology and the creative arts.
Landscape architectural education involves the acquisition of knowledge within the following broad areas:

1. History of cultural form and an understanding of design as a social art
2. Cultural and natural systems
3. Plant material and horticultural applications
4. Site engineering including materials, methods, technologies, construction documentation and administration, and applications
5. Theory and methodologies in design and planning
6. Landscape design, management, planning and science at all scales and applications
7. Information technology and computer applications
8. Public policy and regulation
9. Communications and public facilitation
10. Ethics and values related to the profession

The following key knowledge areas are therefore prominent:

1. Technical design knowledge (1, 2,3,4,5,6)
2. Business effectiveness skills (7)
3. Inter-personal effectiveness skills (9)
4. Socio-economic responsiveness/social responsibility (8,10)

Architect competency profile

The UNESCO/UIA charter for architectural education of 2005 (revised in 2006) has developed the following competency profiles:

1. an ability to create architectural designs that satisfy both aesthetic and technical requirements;
2. an adequate knowledge of the history and theories of architecture and the related arts, technologies and human sciences;

3. a knowledge of the fine arts as an influence on the quality of architectural design;
4. an adequate knowledge of urban design, planning and the skills involved in the planning process;
5. an understanding of the relationship between people and buildings, and between buildings and their environment, and of the need to relate buildings and the spaces between them to human needs and scale;
6. an understanding of the profession of architecture and the role of the architect in society, in particular in preparing briefs that take account of social factors;
7. an understanding of the methods of investigation and preparation of the brief for a design project;
8. an understanding of the structural design, constructional and engineering problems associated with building design;
9. an adequate knowledge of physical problems and technologies and of the function of buildings so as to provide them with internal conditions of comfort and protection against the climate;
10. the necessary design skills to meet building users requirements within the constraints imposed by cost factors and building regulations;
11. an adequate knowledge of the industries, organization, regulations and procedures involved in translating design concepts into buildings and integrating plans into overall planning.

The following key knowledge areas are therefore prominent:

1. Technical design knowledge (1, 2,3,4,8,9,10)
2. Socio-economic responsiveness/social responsibility (5,6,11)






Read more!
 
posted by JOHN F.PAPILAYA at 21.19 | Permalink | 0 comments
Pendidikan arsitektur
P
ada dasarnya kualitas keahlian seorang arsitektur terletak pada kemampuan pendidikan arsitektur lansekap yang pada awalnya memberikan pengetahuan dasar bagi calon seorang sarjana arsitek, sebuah artikel dengan judul pendidikan arsitektur dari situs esubijono.wordpress.com (telah mendapat izin untuk di share).mungkin dapat menambah wawasan mengenai kelengkapan pengetahuan yang mutlak dimiliki oleh seorang arsitek.

Ada 37 butir pengetahuan dasar (yang seharusnya dikuasai oleh) sarjana arsitektur. Basic knowledge for architecture graduates. Butir-butir ini dikelompokkan menjadi 3 bagian yaitu kelompok pengetahuan dasar yang cukup dikuasai setara dengan Awareness (be aware of), kelompok Understand (comprehensively understand) dan kelompok Ability (be able to do it).

Untuk mahasiswa dan sarjana baru arsitektur, pedoman ini bagus juga dipakai untuk mengukur kemampuan diri sendiri, dan bertanya kepada dosen bila ada pengetahuan yang tidak diajarkan …

1. Ketrampilan verbal (Verbal Skills)

Kemampuan untuk berbicara dan menulis secara efektif mengenai materi dalam kurikulum profesional.

2. Ketrampilan grafis (Graphic Skills)


Kemampuan untuk menggunakan media presentasi yang tepat, termasuk teknologi komputer, untuk menyampaikan pada setiap tahapan perancangan, unsur-unsur penting dalam program bangunan serta perancangan arsitektur dan urban.

3. Ketrampilan riset (Research Skills)

Kemampuan untuk melakukan metode dasar pengumpulan data dan analisis untuk menerangkan semua aspek pemrograman dan proses perancangan.

4. Ketrampilan berpikir kritis (Critical Thinking Skills)

Kemampuan untuk membuat analisa dan evaluasi menyeluruh dari sebuah bangunan, kompleks bangunan atau ruang urban.


5. Ketrampilan dasar merancang (Fundamental Design Skills)

Kemampuan untuk menerapkan prinsip-prinsip dasar pengorganisasian ruang, struktur dan konstruksi ke dalam konsepsi dan pengembangan ruang interior dan exterior, unsur-unsur serta komponen bangunan.

6. Ketrampilan bekerjasama (Collaborative Skills)

Kemampuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengambil peran yang memaksimalkan bakat individual, dan kemampuan untuk bekerjasama dengan siswa-siswa lain ketika bekerja dalam suatu tim perancangan.

7. Perilaku manusia (Human Behavior)

Kepekaan terhadap teori dan metode pertanyaan yang bertujuan memperjelas hubungan antara perilaku manusia dan lingkungan fisik.

8. Keragaman manusia (Human Diversity)

Kepedulian akan keragaman kebutuhan, nilai, etika, norma perilaku, serta pola sosial dan spasial yang membedakan berbagai kebudayaan, dan implikasi dari keragaman itu untuk peran sosial dan tanggungjawab arsitek.

9. Sejarah dan preseden (History and Precedent)

Kemampuan membuat rasionalisasi preseden bentuk dan program dan mampu menerapkannya pada konsep dan pengembangan proyek-proyek arsitektur dan urban.

10. Tradisi nasional dan lokal (National and Local Traditions)

Pemahaman tentang tradisi nasional dan warisan lokal regional dalam rancangan arsitektur, lansekap dan urban, termasuk tradisi vernakular.

11. Tradisi Timur (Eastern Traditions)

Pemahaman tentang aturan dan tradisi Timur dalam perancangan arsitektur, lansekap, dan urban, serta faktor cuaca, teknologi, sosioekonomi dan faktor-faktor lainnya yang telah membentuk dan mempertahankannya.

12. Tradisi Barat (Western Traditions)

Kepekaan terhadap keseragaman sekaligus keragaman aturan dan tradisi perancangan arsitektur dan urban di dunia Barat.

13. Pelestarian lingkungan (Environmental Conservation)

Pemahaman tentang prinsip-prinsip dasar ekologi dan tanggungjawab arsitek dalam hubungannya dengan pelestarian sumber daya dan lingkungan dalam perancangan arsitektur dan urban.

14. Aksesibilitas (Accessibility)

Kemampuan untuk merancang tapak dan bangunan untuk mengakomodasikan individu dengan kemampuan fisik yang bermacam-macam.

15. Kondisi tapak (Site Conditions)

Kemampuan untuk menjawab karakter alam dan lingkungan buatan pada tapak dalam pengembangan program dan perancangan proyek.

16. Sistim tata bentuk (Formal Ordering Systems)

Pemahaman tentang dasar-dasar persepsi visual dan prinsip-prinsip sistim tatanan pada rancangan dua dan tiga dimensi, komposisi arsitektur dan perancangan urban.

17. Sistim struktur (Structural Systems)

Pemahaman mengenai perilaku struktur dalam menahan gravitasi dan gaya-gaya lateral serta evolusi rentang dan penerapan yang tepat dari sistim struktur kontemporer.

18. Sistim penyelamatan pada bangunan (Building Life Safety Systems)

Pemahaman mengenai prinsip-prinsip dasar rancangan dan pemilihan sistim dan subsistim penyelamatan pada bangunan.

19. Sistim sampul bangunan (Building Envelope Systems)

Pemahaman tentang prinsip-prinsip rancangan sistim penutup luar bangunan.

20. Sistim lingkungan ruang bangunan (Building Environmental Systems)

Pemahaman tentang prinsip-prinsip dasar rancangan sistim struktur bangunan, sistem lingkungan, termasuk pencahayaan, akustik dan pengkondisian ruang serta pemakaian enerji.

21. Sistim pelayanan bangunan (Building Service Systems)

Pemahaman tentang prinsip-prinsip dasar rancangan sistim pelayanan bangunan, termasuk pemipaan, transportasi vertikal, komunikasi, keamanan dan perlindungan kebakaran.

22. Integrasi sistim-sistim bangunan (Building Systems Integration)

Kemampuan untuk menilai, memilih dan menyatukan sistim struktur, sistim penutup bangunan, sistim lingkungan, pelayanan dan penyelamatan, ke dalam suatu rancangan bangunan.

23. Tanggung jawab hukum (Legal Responsibilities)

Pemahaman tentang tanggung jawab hukum arsitek dalam kaitannya dengan kesehatan, keselamatan dan kesejahteraan masyarakat; hak properti, aturan dalam zoning dan subdivisi; peraturan bangunan, aksesibilitas dan faktor-faktor lain yang mempengaruhi rancangan bangunan, konstruksi dan praktek arsitektur.

24. Kepatuhan terhadap peraturan bangunan (Building Code Compliance)

Pemahaman tentang persyaratan dan peraturan bangunan, standar yang dapat diterapkan pada tapak tertentu, termasuk klasifikasi penggunaan, tinggi dan luasan bangunan yang diijinkan, tipe konstruksi yang diijinkan, persyaratan pemisahan, persyaratan penggunaan, alat evakuasi, perlindungan kebakaran dan struktur.

25. Bahan bangunan dan pemasangannya (Building Materials and Assemblies)

Pemahaman tentang prinsip-prinsip, konvensi, standar-standar, aplikasi dan batasan pembuatan, penggunaan dan pemasangan bahan-bahan bangunan.

26. Ekonomi bangunan dan pengendalian biaya (Building Economics and Cost Control)

Kepekaan terhadap dasar-dasar pembiayaan bangunan, ekonomi bangunan dan pengendalian biaya konstruksi dalam kerangka proyek perancangan.

27. Pengembangan detail rancangan (Detailed Design Development)

Kemampuan untuk menilai, memilih, menyusun dan merinci sebagai suatu bagian utuh perancangan, serta menyusun dengan tepat bahan dan komponen bangunan untuk memenuhi persyaratan program bangunan.

28. Dokumentasi grafis (Graphic Documentation)

Kemampuan untuk membuat deskripsi teknis yang akurat dan dokumentasi suatu proposal perancangan untuk tujuan penilaian dan konstruksi.

29. Perancangan menyeluruh (Comprehensive Design)

Kemampuan untuk menghasilkan sebuah proyek arsitektur diawali dengan program yang menyeluruh sejak rancangan skematik hingga pengembangan detail termasuk program ruang, sistim struktur dan lingkungan, perlengkapan penyelamatan, dinding-dinding dan elemen bangunan, serta untuk menilai hasil akhir proyek itu sesuai dengan kriteria perancangan.

30. Penyiapan program (Program Preparation)

Kemampuan untuk menyusun program komprehensif untuk proyek perancangan arsitektur, termasuk menilai kebutuhan pemberi tugas, telaah kritis mengenai presen bentuk, inventarisasi ruang dan persyaratan peralatan, definisi kriteria pemilihan tapak, analisa kondisi tapak, telaah hukum dan standar-standar yang berlaku, penilaian implikasi unsur-unsur tersebut terhadap proyek, serta definisi kriteria penilaian perancangan.

31. Konteks hukum praktik arsitektur (The Legal Context of Architecture Practice)

Kepekaan terhadap berkembangnya konteks hukum tempat arsitek berpraktek, dan hukum-hukum yang berkaitan dengan registrasi profesional, kontrak jasa profesional serta pembentukan usaha jasa perancangan.

32. Organisasi dan manajemen praktek (Practice Organization and Management)

Kepekaan terhadap prinsip-prinsip dasar organisasi kantor, kepemimpinan, rencana usaha, pemasaran, negosiasi dan manajemen keuangan, sebagaimana dapat diterapkan pada praktek arsitektur.

33. Dokumentasi dan kontrak (Contracts and Documentation)

Kepekaan terhadap berbagai metode penyelesaian proyek, format kontrak jasa yang sesuai, dan tipe dokumentasi yang diperlukan untuk memberikan jasa profesional yang kompeten dan bertanggung jawab.

34. Pemagangan (Professional Internship)

Pemahaman mengenai peran permagangan dalam pengembangan profesional, serta hak-hak dan tanggung jawab silang antara pemagang dan pembimbing.

35. Penghayatan peran arsitek (Breadth of the Architect’s Role)

Kepekaan terhadap pentingnya peran arsitek dalam insepsi proyek perancangan dan pengembangan rancangan, administrasi kontrak, termasuk pemilihan dan koordinasi disiplin ilmu lain, evaluasi setelah penggunaan dan manajemen fasilitas.

36. Kondisi masa lalu dan akan datang (Past and Present Conditions for Architecture)

Pemahaman tentang perubahan-perubahan yang terjadi karena pengaruh sosial, politik, teknologi, dan ekonomi -masa lalu dan masa kini- atas peran arsitek terhadap lingkungan binaan.

37. Etika dan penilaian profesional (Ethics and Professional Judgement)

Kepekaan terhadap masalah etika dalam pengambilan keputusan yang profesional dalam praktek dan perancangan arsitektur.

Read more!
 
posted by JOHN F.PAPILAYA at 01.15 | Permalink | 0 comments